PowerHouse on Linux
Edis, Robert
Robert.Edis@blistex.com
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:09:17 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEA1.9B843DC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Jeff
For such small packages PH nor VB or Java will EVER be viable. MS Access is
great for small apps, quick to develop in, flexible with forms, reports,
database all rolled into one AND can be sold as a 'compiled' version. As
long as you have only a handful of users and no more than 2GB of data go
with Access.
Blue
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Hoffman [mailto:wonicon@optushome.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:36 PM
To: powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
Subject: Re: PowerHouse on Linux
At 12:38 PM 02-04-03 -0800, Chuck Reinke wrote:
>>>>
Well this is an interesting economic analysis. Programming talent must be
little valued in Australia. In the US the cost you cite might buy 2 to 10
days of consulting effort in the US. If programmer makes about $10.00/ hr
where you are, maybe it's a real advantage to develop and maintain a system
in C++, visual basic or something like that.
<<<<
Very true my friend, however I have this dream, that small business could be
advantaged by purchasing a package developed in PH.
As we all know it is more cost effective to develop a system using PH and
more versatile with maintenance.
I ran a shop using 2 developers using PH, doing the same work as another
shop employing upto 10 developers using Powerbuilder.
How can PC packages be develop using C++ etc that should cost a lot more to
be produced and maintained, be sold for less than a US$500, yet if we did
the same with PH the starting price has to include the US$3,000 PH licence,
before you add development costs.
I guess I will just keep on dreaming.
Jeff
>>>>
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:mr_lalley@yahoo.com>Craig Lalley
To: <mailto:wonicon@optushome.com.au>Jeff Hoffman ;
<mailto:powerh-l@lists.swau.edu>powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: PowerHouse on Linux
Jeff Hoffman <<mailto:wonicon@optushome.com.au>wonicon@optushome.com.au>
wrote:
Another reason that PH will not advance is cost, I was just looking at PH
8.41 on Win2000 and if I developed a system for a customer there would be
immediately a $6,000 ($australian approx 3,000 $US) upfront cost for just
the PH licenece (one developer / five user run-time / five user data
access) I would then have to recover development costs. This would put the
Kybo on most projects.
I remember when the current OS that was happening was OS/2 vs the yet to be
released Win95, circa 1995. That year I went to Comdex.
IBM was trying to sell thier developers kits for $395 (I think, it may have
been more.)
Microsoft was giving them away by the handful.
The rest is history.
-Craig
----------
Do you Yahoo!?
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/mailsig/*http://tax.yahoo.com>Yahoo! Tax
Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
<<<<
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Mailing list:
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu Subscribe: "subscribe" in message body to
powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe " in message body
to powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu
http://lists.swau.edu/mailman/listinfo/powerh-l This list is closed, thus to
post to the list you must be a subscriber.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEA1.9B843DC0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2722.900" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=609550614-09042003>Jeff</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=609550614-09042003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=609550614-09042003>For
such small packages PH nor VB or Java will EVER be viable. MS Access is
great for small apps, quick to develop in, flexible with forms, reports,
database all rolled into one AND can be sold as a 'compiled' version. As
long as you have only a handful of users and no more than 2GB of data go with
Access.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=609550614-09042003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=609550614-09042003>Blue</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Jeff Hoffman
[mailto:wonicon@optushome.com.au]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 02, 2003
3:36 PM<BR><B>To:</B> powerh-l@lists.swau.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
PowerHouse on Linux<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P>At 12:38 PM 02-04-03 -0800, Chuck Reinke wrote: </P>
<P>>>>> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well this is an interesting economic analysis.
Programming talent must be little valued in Australia. In the US the cost you
cite might buy 2 to 10 days of consulting effort in the US. If programmer
makes about $10.00/ hr where you are, maybe it's a real advantage to develop
and maintain a system in C++, visual basic or something like that. </FONT></P>
<P></P>
<P><<<< </P>
<P>Very true my friend, however I have this dream, that small business could
be advantaged by purchasing a package developed in PH. </P><BR>
<P>As we all know it is more cost effective to develop a system using PH and
more versatile with maintenance. </P><BR>
<P>I ran a shop using 2 developers using PH, doing the same work as another
shop employing upto 10 developers using Powerbuilder. </P><BR>
<P>How can PC packages be develop using C++ etc that should cost a lot more to
be produced and maintained, be sold for less than a US$500, yet if we did the
same with PH the starting price has to include the US$3,000 PH licence, before
you add development costs. </P><BR>
<P>I guess I will just keep on dreaming. </P><BR>
<P>Jeff </P><BR>
<P>>>>> </P><BR>
<P></P>
<P>----- Original Message ----- </P>
<P><B>From:</B> <mailto:mr_lalley@yahoo.com>Craig Lalley </P>
<P><B>To:</B> <mailto:wonicon@optushome.com.au>Jeff Hoffman ;
<mailto:powerh-l@lists.swau.edu>powerh-l@lists.swau.edu </P>
<P><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:54 PM </P>
<P><B>Subject:</B> Re: PowerHouse on Linux </P>
<P></P>
<P></P>
<P></P>
<P><B><I>Jeff Hoffman
<<mailto:wonicon@optushome.com.au>wonicon@optushome.com.au></I>
wrote: </B></P>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>Another reason that PH will not advance is cost, I was just looking at
PH </B></P>
<P><B>8.41 on Win2000 and if I developed a system for a customer there would
be </B></P>
<P><B>immediately a $6,000 ($australian approx 3,000 $US) upfront cost for
just </B></P>
<P><B>the PH licenece (one developer / five user run-time / five user data
</B></P>
<P><B>access) I would then have to recover development costs. This would put
the </B></P>
<P><B>Kybo on most projects. </B></P>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>I remember when the current OS that was happening was OS/2 vs the yet to
be released Win95, circa 1995. That year I went to Comdex. </B></P>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>IBM was trying to sell thier developers kits for $395 (I think, it may
have been more.) </B></P>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>Microsoft was giving them away by the handful. </B></P>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>The rest is history. </B></P>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>-Craig </B></P>
<P><B></B></P><BR>
<P><B></B></P>
<P><B>---------- </B></P>
<P><B>Do you Yahoo!? </B></P>
<P><B><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/mailsig/*http://tax.yahoo.com>Yahoo!
Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more </B></P><BR><BR>
<P><B><<<< </B></P><BR>
<P>= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Mailing list:
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu Subscribe: "subscribe" in message body to
powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe " in message body to
powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu
http://lists.swau.edu/mailman/listinfo/powerh-l This list is closed, thus to
post to the list you must be a subscriber.</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEA1.9B843DC0--