Best way to implement Cognos

[Pickering, John (NORBORD)]

Byron

Sounds like a posting designed to start a platform flame fest :-)

Do the "multiple locations" really need their own servers? Is there a
political or other non-technical reason for not employing a biggish central
server and wide area connections to it? Communications costs have fallen to
the point where having one big box is probably cheaper and is certainly
easier to manage.

But to contribute to the "my box is better than yours" thread that your
original question started, of course a new N class HP e3000 with TurboImage
would be the platform and database of choice. Let me know if you need help
implementing this system.

Regards,
JWP


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Byron Welch [SMTP:byron.welch@creatcomp.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:47 AM
> To:	powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
> Subject:	Best way to implement Cognos
> 
> I am currently working with a customer who will be rolling out a
> PowerHouse
> application consisting of 200 screens 100 quiz and 50 Qtp to multiple
> locations each location has about 10 concurrent users.  I am curious what
> everyone thinks the most cost effective/reliable platform/database
> combination would be for the one development location and the other run
> time
> locations?
> 
> Byron Welch
> Creative Computing, Inc.
> 100 Middle Street
> Lincoln, RI 02865
> (401) 727-0183
>