Anyone have Moved from VMS to WINDOWS?

Ken Langendock Ken@Langendock.com
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:06:36 -0500 (EST)


Hey DUDE....Don't be removing my DUMP command.

I don't like to type.

I learned about SET ASSUMED way back when I was a
COGNOS employee. I learned to use it only in non
confusing instances. If people don't qualify their
source code (as they should every time) it can cause
hours of searching.

 --- "Deskin, Bob" <Bob.Deskin@cognos.com> wrote: 
> But then they wouldn't be "undocumented" :-)
> 
> Seriously, some things just slip through. If we
> catch them, they go into
> Release Notes or New Features books.
> 
> As for SET ASSUMED, as far as I can tell, it's only
> available in QDESIGN
> and it is in the latest manual. And DUMP was added
> many years ago by a
> developer who didn't want to enter ACCESS file,
> REPORT ALL, GO during
> testing. It's there now but no guarantees for the
> future. That may have
> been the same developer who added OG into the syntax
> as a synonym for
> GO. That one has been removed.
> 
> Bob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: powerh-l-admin@lists.sowder.com
> [mailto:powerh-l-admin@lists.sowder.com] On Behalf
> Of Ken Langendock
> Sent: March 9, 2005 10:45 AM
> To: powerh-l@lists.sowder.com
> Subject: RE: Anyone have Moved from VMS to WINDOWS?
> 
> 
> DAMN
> 
> These undocumented features are a pain in the @@s
> 
> I just tried this and it worked beautifully. I could
> have saved myself hours of work.
> 
> I think we need to start creating a new manual.
> "Powerhouse, The Undocumented features".
> 
> Here are a couple more.
> 
> SET ASSUMED (Not to be used in critical situations)
> DUMP filename (in quiz = access filename, report
> all,
> go)
> 
> 
>  --- "Deskin, Bob" <Bob.Deskin@cognos.com> wrote: 
> > Our recommendation when migrating from
> IMAGE/indexed
> > to relational is to
> > use Axiant. However, there is an undocumented
> > feature (no I don't know
> > why it's undocumented) of QSHOW that will let you
> > generate a skeleton
> > SQL table definition.
> > 
> > In QSHOW:
> > 
> > SET LANG SQL
> > GENERATE DATABASE <indexed-file>
> > 
> > Yes, I know it's a FILE and not a DATABASE, but
> you
> > have to fool QSHOW
> > into thinking it's dealing with relational.
> > 
> > On Windows, this create a file named qshogen.sql
> > with the basic table
> > definition. If you generate all your files this
> way
> > and put the results
> > together, and add the constraints and so on, you
> can
> > come up with a
> > fairly complete database schema. It's not as good
> as
> > Axiant but it's a
> > start.
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: powerh-l-admin@lists.sowder.com 
> > [mailto:powerh-l-admin@lists.sowder.com] On Behalf
> Of Ken Langendock
> > Sent: March 9, 2005 10:18 AM
> > To: powerh-l@lists.sowder.com
> > Subject: Re: Anyone have Moved from VMS to
> WINDOWS?
> > 
> > 
> > I know there have been many conversations flying
> > back
> > and forth about how to convert from ISAM/KSAM/RMS
> to
> > a database. And
> > unless I didn't see the actually "final" message.
> > There wasn't a nice
> > way of doing this unless you are going Axiant.
> > 
> > Mom always told me to never touched the stuff.
> > 
> > When I converted from ISAM (or all of the above) I
> > exported my file definitions in QSHOW to PDL.
> > 
> > Then I started my Search and Replace routine.
> > 1) change all the - to _
> > 2) change all file names to sql sytax "create..."
> > 3) changed all item statements to sql syntax.
> > 4) etc.
> > 5)....test/retest.
> > 
> > Ken
> > 
> > 
> >  --- Othman <othman2@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > how about the database migration.
> > > 
> > > our system running with the following
> environment 
> > > -System:	HP 3000/968 Rx
> > > -OS : MPE / ix HP 31900
> > > 	
> > > -Reporting	Quiz - Cognos PowerHouse 8.19.C4
> > version.
> > > 	
> > > -Screen Designing	QDESIGN - Cognos PowerHouse
> > > 8.19.C4 version.
> > > 	
> > > -Transaction Processing	QTP - Cognos PowerHouse
> > > 8.19.C4 version.
> > > 	
> > > -Data Base Dictionary	PDL - Cognos PowerHouse
> > > 8.19.C4 version.
> > > 
> > > what is the recommended path to migrate to NT
> ,MS
> > > SQL
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:44:56 -0500 (EST), Ken
> > > Langendock
> > > <ken.langendock@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure what you mean by tool.
> > > > 
> > > > I used a free ware search and replace tool
> that
> > I downloaded from
> > > > the net to fix the source.
> > > > 
> > > > The last conversion was from DG ISAM to ISAM
> for
> > > NT.
> > > > So all I did there was export the file
> > definitions
> > > > from QSHOW on the UNIX box and cleaned them up
> > for
> > > NT.
> > > > 
> > > > Most of the time I convert everything by
> search
> > > and
> > > > replace then do the rest by hand.
> > > > 
> > > > By using my application as a building block. I
> > > > converted a 100 program application within 2
> > weeks
> > > > (working at night). And that app was written
> > back
> > > in
> > > > the early 80's, it was all crap code.
> > > > 
> > > > Ken
> > > > 
> > > > --- Othman <othman2@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > what tool did you use for migration
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:50:58 -0500 (EST), Ken
> > > > > Langendock
> > > > > <ken.langendock@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I have converted an application from many
> > > machines
> > > > > to
> > > > > > other lines.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I started out on the VAX (in my opinion
> the
> > > best
> > > > > > machine still to this day), then to
> HP3000,
> > > then
> > > > > UNIX
> > > > > > (HP, SUN, IBM, DG, etc) then to Powerhouse
> > NT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I created a system management module that
> > > takes
> > > > > all of
> > > > > > the O/S level code away from your
> > application.
> 
=== message truncated ===