Y2K - am I missing something?

[Shawn Gordon]

version 8.19C which is the "more y2k compliant" version doesn't seem to be
able to handle some basic functions, maybe I'm just missing something.
Being Y2K compliant doesn't necessarily mean that you have centuries in
your dates, it just means you can deal with the century.  We are leaving
are dates in 6 characters because we can, but the DAYS function doesn't
appear to work correctly on dates that are in the new century.  No amount
of coaxing  with CENTURY INCLUDED or otherwise seems to help.

any ideas?

thanks,
shawn


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to bit.listserv.powerh-l
This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you must be a subscriber.