termtype for batch quick

[Jon Hawks]

Agree with Ray, the default vt100 gave me the least
problems too. 

By the way, Cognosian's, wouldn't it be nice to
upgrade QTP to use some of those wonderful Quick
commands.  I can think of some very useful places
where I may want to switch from volume processing to
transactional interrogation and then resume volproc
again.  

I would like to suggest the use of permitting WHILE
RETRIEVING as a start.  

Crazy? I guess after you use these tools so long,you
start inventing uses for them yourself.

--- pickerij@norbord.com wrote:
> For running Quick in a batch job what termtype
> should I use to produce   
> the least amount of nonsense?
> 
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> = = = = = = = = = = = =
> Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to
> majordomo@lists.swau.edu
> Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to
> majordomo@lists.swau.edu
> powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to
> bit.listserv.powerh-l
> This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you
> must be a subscriber.
> 

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to bit.listserv.powerh-l
This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you must be a subscriber.