Is there a future for PowerHouse?

[Richard Witkopp]

Yup, our site is migrating off onto Oracle/web. Don't discount "HP Itanium that are 12 years old". Ours blazes. For most of the jobs we run, you submit it, and it's done before you can display the queue. It smokes our web app so badly it's not even funny.

Few programmers dislike Powerhouse, imo. The hatred comes from upper management. They have to pay for it, and I think that's where Cognos killed it's golden goose.

As for web being the platform of the future, I disagree. At least, not in it's current form. It sucks on many levels. The only thing good about it is the ability to run in a browser.

________________________________
From: powerh-l-bounces+rwitkopp=phxa.com at lists.sowder.com [mailto:powerh-l-bounces+rwitkopp=phxa.com at lists.sowder.com] On Behalf Of JA Vaughn Smith
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 7:11 AM
To: powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: Is there a future for PowerHouse?

I have been back on an OpenVMS system using PowerHouse, (PH), for 4 months now. In that time, I have been re-amazed at the things I can do with Qdesign, QTP and Quiz. Before this year, I did some work learning PHP and Python with mySQL, typical Windows development tools. PH has them beat from a productivity standpoint, and not by just a bit either.

Realistically, what future does PowerHouse have? The products are 30+ years old but they still perfrom quite well on the right hardware. With the exception of Unix and Windows, they run on antiquated hardware, though. The HP 3000 MPE is done; HP offers help to move these sites to Unix or Windows platforms. OpenVMS sites can move to HP Itanium machines which are about 12 years old and have a very uncertain future. PH used to run on IBM AS/400. What's up with that these days? Unix and Windows remain viable platforms for PowerHouse deployment since you can actually buy modern servers from various manufacturers.

What about the future of PowerHouse itself? IBM has stated that PH will remain supported as long asit makes business sense. That said, there are no future updates planned at this time. The longstanding problems remain:

 *   only 31 files in a Qdesign screen
 *   popular databases are unsupported, (mySQL, others?)
 *   PH Windows uses ODBC 2.5 from 1994. Version 3.8 is now current.
 *   POW, the automated interface to the PDL dictionary, ships with OpenVMS only
 *   PH screens look old. Users must learn specific keyboard commands
 *   Web interface must be done with the PH Web add on which generates code that usually requires further modifications to address design requirements.
 *   poor runtime error notifications
 *   very limited number of PH sites, and declining
 *   extremely limited number of Axiant sites
 *   many, (most, all?), PH programmers have grey hair

It is my belief that IBM has a great product with PowerHouse. I also believe that they barely understand this fact and that the corporation purchased Cognos for the great business intelligence tools,mainly. The PowerHouse business has to have seen substantial decline for IBM over the years. How many more sites can convert to other development environments, reducing IBM's revenue, before they shut down Cognos?

Sincerely,
Vaughn Smith
Canada

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Any other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination may be subject to legal restriction. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies including any attachments.

==============================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sowder.com/pipermail/powerh-l/attachments/20120501/b08a65b8/attachment.htm>