PH In India
Johnson, Tracy
Tracy.Johnson at meas-spec.com
Fri Jun 8 08:26:01 CDT 2007
Back to the discussion earlier this week ...
Perhaps one needs to be in the right caste to be a PH programmer in
India?
Tracy Johnson
Measurement Specialties, Inc.
BT
NNNN
-----Original Message-----
From: volokh-bounces at lists.powerblogs.com
[mailto:volokh-bounces at lists.powerblogs.com] On Behalf Of
notify at powerblogs.com
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:04 PM
To: volokh at lists.powerblogs.com
Subject: [Volokh] David Bernstein: Affirmative Action in India:
Posted by David Bernstein:
Affirmative Action in India:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_06_03-2007_06_09.shtml#118126102
7
[1]Taipei Times:
Enraged mobs from one of India's myriad lower castes blocked roads
with fiery barricades, stoned police and battled rival castes
across a wide swath of northern India for a week to make a single,
simple point: They want to be even lower.
With 25 people dead, the unrest spread to the fringes of the
capital before the Gujjars a class of farmers and shepherds
called off their protests.
They did so only after officials agreed to consider their demand to
be officially shunted to the lowest rung of India's complex
hereditary caste system, so they can get government jobs and
university spots reserved for such groups....
Discrimination under the system was outlawed soon after
independence from Britain in 1947, but its influence remains
powerful and the government has sought to redress discrimination
against those on the lower rungs by setting up quotas for
government jobs and university spots.
But instead of weakening caste affiliations, the result has been a
fracturing of politics along caste lines, with each of the lower
groups vying for its share of the quotas....
"Nowhere in the world do castes queue up to be branded as
backward," [the Indian Supreme Court] said. "Nowhere in the world
is there a competition to become backward."
Affirmative action has its good points and bad points, but I think
it's undeniable that when government distributes benefits based on
particular characteristics, lots of people will want to be identified
as having those characteristics, there will be lobbying to ensure
that
the relevant characteristics become legally immutable at a minimum
,or
broadened, and people will organize and lobby around their common
claim to the relevant characteristic. This all makes it a lot less
likely that the relevant societal distinctions that led to the need
for the affirmative action policies to begin with will wither away.
Query: If the Irish, Scandinavians, and Italians in the United
States--all groups that were once suffered a great deal of
discrimination and were relatively disadvantaged compared to the
Anglo-Saxon/German majority (plurality?)--had been offered government
benefits based on their ancestry one hundred years ago, would these
groups be as integrated into American life as they are today? If not,
than this is a cost to such policies that must be weighed against the
benefits.
Thanks to my colleague Lloyd Cohen for the pointer.
References
1.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2007/06/06/2003364132
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh at lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
More information about the powerh-l
mailing list