Powerhouse Enhancement - ACCESS VIA, USING, IF
Deskin, Bob
Bob.Deskin at Cognos.COM
Wed Jul 11 08:50:50 CDT 2007
Don't know if I still think that fast :-) And I do have some other
things to do first.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Langendock [mailto:Ken at Langendock.com]
Sent: July 11, 2007 9:49 AM
To: Deskin, Bob; mcl_systems at telus.net
Cc: powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: RE: Powerhouse Enhancement - ACCESS VIA, USING, IF
Sooooooooooooooo, I should have my answer in about 10 minutes or
so???
________________________________
From: Deskin, Bob [mailto:Bob.Deskin at Cognos.COM]
Sent: July 11, 2007 9:43 AM
To: Ken Langendock; mcl_systems at telus.net
Cc: powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: RE: Powerhouse Enhancement - ACCESS VIA, USING, IF
I suspect it wouldn't make much difference in development time
for us. We'd basically encapsulate everything generated from that ACCESS
statement within the IF. On the surface it looks straightforward, but I
need to think about side effects, inter-relationship with the FIND
procedure, relational database effects, etc.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Langendock [mailto:Ken at Langendock.com]
Sent: July 11, 2007 9:40 AM
To: Deskin, Bob; mcl_systems at telus.net
Cc: powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: RE: Powerhouse Enhancement - ACCESS VIA, USING,
IF
As an option to make the implementation easier you could
make the REQUEST and IF mutually exclusive.
I think it would be better in the long run to be able to
specify both, but for the example provided that would be enough.
Ken
________________________________
From: Deskin, Bob [mailto:Bob.Deskin at Cognos.COM]
Sent: July 11, 2007 9:33 AM
To: mcl_systems at telus.net
Cc: Ken Langendock; powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: RE: Powerhouse Enhancement - ACCESS, VIA,
USING, IF
Okay. I'll think on this one. As usual, no promises.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Lee [mailto:mcl_systems at telus.net]
Sent: July 9, 2007 6:37 PM
To: Deskin, Bob
Cc: Ken Langendock; powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: Re: Powerhouse Enhancement - ACCESS,
VIA, USING, IF
That's a great suggestion. I've had to modify
the PATH and FIND procedure several times for just such cases.
Deskin, Bob wrote:
Interesting idea. Can I get a feel from
the list as to how often people modify the PATH procedure? And would
something like this reduce that need? Why else do you write your own
PATH procedures?
We generate the PATH and FIND based on
ACCESS statements (specified or implied) for the PRIMARY file. The two
procedures are tied together. The generation is fairly basic at this
point.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From:
powerh-l-bounces+bob.deskin=cognos.com at lists.sowder.com
[mailto:powerh-l-bounces+bob.deskin=cognos.com at lists.sowder.com] On
Behalf Of Ken Langendock
Sent: June 25, 2007 8:33 AM
To: powerh-l at lists.sowder.com
Subject: Powerhouse Enhancement -
ACCESS, VIA, USING, IF
Here is a new enhancement targeted at
reducing the number of times a programmer has to hard code the PATH
procedure.
FILE Users PRIMARY
ACCESS VIA UserId &
USING T-UserId &
IF T-UserId NE " "
ACCESS VIA UserId &
USING UserId &
REQUEST UserId
ACCESS SEQUENTIAL
This new feature would generate a PATH
statement similar to the following thus removing the requirement of hard
coding the PATH every time we want to "override" the default path
because of passed-in values or re-finding based on a temporary item.
etc.
PROCEDURE PATH
BEGIN
IF T-UserId NE " "
THEN LET PATH = 1
IF PATH = 0
THEN PROMPT T-UserId
...
END
Ken
This message may contain privileged
and/or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in
error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy,
disseminate or distribute it; do not open any attachments, delete it
immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by e-mail
that you have done so. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sowder.com/pipermail/powerh-l/attachments/20070711/fc17a527/attachment-0001.html
More information about the powerh-l
mailing list