More Probs in 8.40D

[brian_matthewsbrian matthews]

I am assuming that transactions are started by screens and are independent 
of the chosen database/dictionary - I should have added that any 'in 
mydatabase' syntax be removed - but assumed that as a given.

regards Bri,


>From: Darren Reely <darren.reely@latticesemi.com>
>CC: powerh-l@lists.sowder.com
>Subject: Re: More Probs in 8.40D
>Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:13:34 -0700
>
>Will having more than one database definition not create independent 
>database transactions that _could_ be thrown out of sync? If so, this seems 
>a bit dangerous.
>
>
>brian_matthewsbrian matthews wrote:
>>even if you mapped only the problem/large tables in the copy database, you 
>>could use syntax like that below - as long as you use 'subdict=search' the 
>>compilers should fall through to the second database when searching for 
>>tablenames not mapped in the first ( you would have only the live database 
>>mapped in the live dictionary )
>>
>>database smallDB...
>>database alltablesDB ...
>>
>>regards Bri,
>
>
>Darren
>
>--
>
>-----------------------------------
>HELP STOP SPAM. STOP USING WINDOWS.
>-----------------------------------
>--
>= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>Mailing list: powerh-l@lists.sowder.com
>Subscribe: "subscribe" in message body to powerh-l-request@lists.sowder.com
>Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe &lt;password&gt;" in message body to 
>powerh-l-request@lists.sowder.com
>http://lists.sowder.com/mailman/listinfo/powerh-l
>This list is closed, thus to post to the list you must be a subscriber.

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger