Auto replies

[Ohmes, Matt]

The difficulty is that I can't find a rule to RESTRICT what is going OUT.  I
can do all kinds of things to the message coming in, and I can send extra
stuff, but the option to auto-reply or not, seems to missing from my
"action" option.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pickering, John (NORBORD) [mailto:PICKERIJ@norbord.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:00 AM
To: 'Ohmes, Matt'; powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
Subject: RE: Auto replies


Since this list server software appends a standard "final footing" :-) to
each message [look at then end of this one -- there should be 3 copies of it
by now!] could you exclude your out of office reply based on some portion of
the text in this footer? The Lookout out of office assistant allows you to
specify text strings in the message body and you can negate the selection
with a check box under "advanced".

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Ohmes, Matt [SMTP:Matt.Ohmes@COGNOS.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:30 AM
> To:	powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
> Subject:	Auto replies
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Actually, I would LOVE to find a way to prevent my "out of office" message
> being sent to the two list servers I belong to.  Does anyone know how to
> prevent Outlook (our standard) from sending auto-reply messages to
> specific
> people or groups?  I have looked at every "Rules Wizard" option I can
> think
> of and have found nothing.
> 
> Matt (trying to be a good list citizen)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Sowder [mailto:davids@cosmic.swau.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: Chris Sharman
> Cc: powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
> Subject: RE: ADMINISTRAVIA: powerh-l list moving
> 
> 
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Chris Sharman wrote:
> >Thanks for the warning, & all the good work over the years.
> >
> >Please, please, is there any chance of the new list software identifying
> the
> >messages as being from a list, so that people who post to the list don't
> >receive a flood of autoreplies ?
> >
> >I believe the appropriate header is "Precedence: list", or "Precedence:
> bulk",
> >or "X-something-List-something" (that's what I look for anyway, although
> the
> >standard and what Microsoft looks for is more important).
> 
> It looks like the new software does what I thought it would.  It uses the
> "Precedence: bulk" header.
> 
> I suspect that a big part of the autoreplies could be from badly behaving
> autoreply programs, but perhaps that is a misconception on my part.  We
> shall see... :)
> 
> --
> David R. Sowder
> Network Manager/Lead Software Technician
> Southwestern Adventist University
> http://www2.swau.edu/~davids/         Primary Email Address:
> davids@swau.edu
> 
> 
> 
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> Mailing list: powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
> Subscribe: "subscribe" in message body to powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu
> Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" in message body to
> powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu
> http://lists.swau.edu/mailman/listinfo/powerh-l
> This list is closed, thus to post to the list you must be a subscriber.
> 
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> Mailing list: powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
> Subscribe: "subscribe" in message body to powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu
> Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" in message body to
> powerh-l-request@lists.swau.edu
> http://lists.swau.edu/mailman/listinfo/powerh-l
> This list is closed, thus to post to the list you must be a subscriber.