PH7.29 vs PH8.19

[John Pearce]

Bob Deskin wrote:
>We did some testing and found that the performance issues were between 7.09
>and 7.29 rather than 7.29 and 8.19. In fact in our tests, 8.19 was slightly
>better than 7.29 but your mileage may vary. Regardless, we recommend that
>you move to 8.19 rather than 7.29C8 since 8.29 will get development support
>(bug fixes) until at least June 30, 2000 plus it was built on MPE/iX 5.5
>express 4. And of course there are the Year 2000 features.

Thanks for the update, Bob.



------------------------------------------------------------------
John Pearce  <jpearce@rmi.net>       | Bethesda Management Company 
Speaking for only myself             | Colorado Springs, CO  USA
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to bit.listserv.powerh-l
This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you must be a subscriber.