PH7.29 vs PH8.19

[pickerij@norbord.com]

John

I'm in the middle of several upgrades to 8.19. We've found no show   
stoppers in 8.19 yet. We chose 8.19 over a "proven" 7.29 for the upgrade   
because of the y2k "friendly" features.

I haven't noticed any great performance penalty (over 7.29) but most of   
our serious machine busting stuff still runs in 5.09.

So far I'm happy with the choice of 8.19 vs. 7.29.

Regards,
John Pickering
Toronto

 -----Original Message-----
From: jpearce@rmi.net [SMTP:MIME @INTERNET {jpearce@rmi.net}]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 1998 9:38 PM
To: powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
Subject: PH7.29 vs PH8.19

I've seen a few comments here related to performance issues of PH8.19 and
I'm wondering if those issues have been resolved?  In about 10 days, I   
have
to decide whether to do a major re-engineering project in 7.29C8 or 8.19.
I'm leaning toward 7.29 because 8.19 is still fairly new and I don't have
the luxury of being a pioneer (you know, the ones with the arrows in   
their
backs <G>).


All comments on 7.29C8 versus 8.19 are welcome.  Reply via e-mail if you
don't wish to make your comments public on this list.


Thanks!

 ------------------------------------------------------------------
John Pearce  <jpearce@rmi.net>       | Bethesda Management Company
Speaking for only myself             | Colorado Springs, CO  USA

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to bit.listserv.powerh-l
This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you must be a subscriber.