QTP Sort
dmaclary@wellmanage.com
dmaclary@wellmanage.com
Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:29:12 -0400
One big item (if I remember correctly). If you are sorting a large
record-complex, and
you only need a few of the items, sorting with Quiz will be faster than
QTP.
Regards,
David Maclary
> ----------
> From: Carol Kaffenberger[SMTP:kaffenbe@kci.wayne.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 1998 10:17 AM
> To: powerh-l@lists.swau.edu
> Subject: QTP Sort
>
> I need to sort on multiple data items in order to eliminate duplicate
> records. From an efficiency standpoint, is it better to sort on the
> data items separately or is it better to concatenate them into 1 big
> field and then sort? Or does it really matter?
>
> Carol
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> = = =
> Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to
> majordomo@lists.swau.edu
> Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to
> majordomo@lists.swau.edu
> powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to bit.listserv.powerh-l
> This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you must be a
> subscriber.
>
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Subscribe: "subscribe powerh-l" in message body to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
Unsubscribe: "unsubscribe powerh-l" in message to majordomo@lists.swau.edu
powerh-l@lists.swau.edu is gatewayed one-way to bit.listserv.powerh-l
This list is closed, thus to post to the list, you must be a subscriber.