<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>Re: Multiple PowerHouse Licenses on a single node</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I'm no Vax expert but if you put a full development license on the production server, why would you want or need a run-time license?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: powerh-l-bounces+john.pickering=norbord.com@lists.sowder.com <powerh-l-bounces+john.pickering=norbord.com@lists.sowder.com><BR>
To: PowerHouse List <powerh-l@lists.sowder.com><BR>
Sent: Wed Dec 05 20:15:38 2007<BR>
Subject: Multiple PowerHouse Licenses on a single node<BR>
<BR>
Hi all<BR>
<BR>
PowerHouse 7.10g on OpenVMS.<BR>
<BR>
We have a legacy client who have the usual configuration of 2 Alphas clustered together - one Alpha licensed for PowerHouse Development and one licensed for PowerHouse Runtime/Reporting for Production.<BR>
There has been no development work done on the system in years and the client wants to know if they can put both PowerHouse licenses onto a single Alpha.<BR>
<BR>
In all the PowerHouse environments I've encountered there has always been (at least) 2 nodes so that development/production didn't interfere with one another in terms of performance, so I've never seen an instance where both licenses are on the one box. .<BR>
<BR>
Can anyone tell me if there's any reason why both PowerHouse licenses can't run on the one node?<BR>
<BR>
And if both licenses CAN be installed on the same node are there any traps to watch out for?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Thanks in advance<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Steve Heaslip<BR>
<BR>
Email: heaslips@ozemail.com.au <<A HREF="mailto:heaslips@ozemail.com.au">mailto:heaslips@ozemail.com.au</A>><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>