<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=us-ascii>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1561" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bottomMargin=0 leftMargin=3 topMargin=0 rightMargin=3>
<DIV>I can't believe I'm the only one on this list in the Visibility
environment. I did hear from 2 people off list who had prior
experience with Vis, but no longer work with it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Anyhow, thanks to the QDESIGN/QUICK DEBUG module, we were able to locate
the bug in IC760 regarding multiple returns to store with different prices and
fix it.</DIV>
<DIV>IC760 turned out to be <FONT color=#0000ff>about 8,400+ lines
of PH code with a few comments (or about 150 Word pages).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Also fixed a minor bug in the related LS145.
Client is pleased that results now match IC762 and that GL trans are
correct.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Roger</FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>--------- Forwarded message ----------<BR>From: Roger L Marcinik <<A
href="mailto:rmarcinik@juno.com">rmarcinik@juno.com</A>><BR>To: <A
href="mailto:powerh-l@lists.sowder.com">powerh-l@lists.sowder.com</A><BR>Date:
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:42:16 -0500<BR>Subject: Any other Visibility
users/developers out there?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This is not a PowerHouse question per se, but Visibility software used by
my client is written in PH. Client no longer has support.<BR>Client has a
problem with screen IC760 results not matching IC762RR results.<BR>Trying to
determine if this is a bug or designed that way.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Roger</DIV></BODY></HTML>